<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t pretend like you have the answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshmock.com/2009/dont-pretend-like-you-have-the-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshmock.com/2009/dont-pretend-like-you-have-the-answer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m an agnostic &#124; Josh Mock</title>
		<link>http://joshmock.com/2009/dont-pretend-like-you-have-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-4406</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m an agnostic &#124; Josh Mock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshmock.com/?p=347#comment-4406</guid>
		<description>[...] David Dark from an article in the latest issue of Relevant Magazine. And, once again, file it with that topic that I&#8217;ve talked about many times. If we think we have faith, because we faithfully protect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Dark from an article in the latest issue of Relevant Magazine. And, once again, file it with that topic that I&#8217;ve talked about many times. If we think we have faith, because we faithfully protect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenni Smith</title>
		<link>http://joshmock.com/2009/dont-pretend-like-you-have-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenni Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshmock.com/?p=347#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>I think part of what I love about the Planet Money podcast from NPR is how often they stress the fact that there is no overwhelming consensus from economists about what to do. The schools of thought are so wide ranging, and there are no proven solutions because there are no labs to test economic theories. No methods for reducing variables.

There seems to be only one thing they do agree on: something has to be done, but I think they could spend another 100 years arguing over what to do.

And it&#039;s all way over my head, though I&#039;m trying to learn to see the clouds and the sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of what I love about the Planet Money podcast from NPR is how often they stress the fact that there is no overwhelming consensus from economists about what to do. The schools of thought are so wide ranging, and there are no proven solutions because there are no labs to test economic theories. No methods for reducing variables.</p>
<p>There seems to be only one thing they do agree on: something has to be done, but I think they could spend another 100 years arguing over what to do.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s all way over my head, though I&#8217;m trying to learn to see the clouds and the sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.327 seconds -->
