Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain
This book just jumped on my “to-read” list.
Music doesn’t represent any tangible, earthly reality. It represents things of the heart, feelings which are beyond description, beyond any experience one has had. The non-representational but indescribably vivid emotional quality is such as to make one think of an immaterial or spiritual world. I dislike both of those words, because for me, the so-called immaterial and spiritual is always vested in the fleshly — in “the holy and glorious flesh,” as Dante said.
[...]
I intensely dislike any reference to supernaturalism, but I think there can be profound mystical feelings which do not have to call on fictitious agencies like angels and demons and deities. The whole natural world is bathed in wonder and beauty and mystery. The feeling of the holy, the sacred, the wonderful, the mystical, can be divorced from anything theological, and is conveyed very powerfully in music.
Maybe Sacks’ atheistic views will help to provide some perspective on my search for reconciliation between art and faith. I don’t think any belief can be fully understood without understanding its major opposing beliefs.

Comments (0)
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL